Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 058
Original file (2013 058.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-058

 

NAME
CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, None Stated, JNC, Unacceptable Conduct, RE4
RELIEF REQUESTED | Upgrade RE code, SPD code, and Narrative Reason

RELIEF GRANTED None
BY DRB

ADMIN None
CORRECTIONS

 

 

TIS | 1 yr, 11 months, 11 days
Policy Implications _| None

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged for Unacceptable Conduct in the summer of 2001, due to tardiness on several
occasions, unsatisfactory grooming, substandard duty performance, failure to pay debts, and unacceptable
housekeeping. The Board utilized available information contained in electronic records and documents
submitted by the applicant.

Following recruit training, the applicant reported to a large vessel in the Fall of 1999. Beginning in the summer
of 2000, the applicant was counseled repeatedly for all of the aforementioned reasons leading to NJP anda
Disciplinary Performance Evaluation in the Fall of 2000. Thereafter, the applicant continued to accumulate
more negative administrative remarks for tardiness, financial irresponsibility, shirking watch stander duties, a
lack of anger management, and violating the terms of the Extra Military Instruction afforded.

The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
The applicant had become a burden to the command in the 21 months while aboard the USCG cutter. A

Honorable Discharge was issued. The applicant was given a lengthy period to meet the basic personal and
professional expectations of an enlisted apprentice.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 047

    Original file (2013 047.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was counseled and taken to NJP for larceny in the Spring of 2001. Therefore, the board recommends relief based on the consistency of these separations, and noting that the JKN code was established to separate individuals for a pattern of misconduct stemming solely from minor disciplinary infractions. Also of note, from an administrative standpoint, the board notes the inconsistency of the applicant’s Entry Into Service Date on the DD-214 worksheet.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 070

    Original file (2012 070.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board recommends no relief. Propriety: Discharge was proper.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 055

    Original file (2013 055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following provides an outline of the approval process and the notable findings: Applicant’s command: Made separation notification after just 3 months on performance probation. The current application requests to remove the Narrative Reason (NR) as ‘Unacceptable Conduct’, and to amend it to a Voluntary Separation that is in alignment with SPD code KND with an NR of Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons. EPM separation approval (summary): In the summer of 2013, the Discharge was...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 054

    Original file (2013 054.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After just a few months, the applicant had difficulty adjusting to military life and went to the clinic for a psychiatric review. In accordance with (post-policy) ALCOAST 252/09, the Board recommends a change to SPD code JFY, Narrative Reason of Adjustment Disorder, and a Re-entry code of RE-3G. The FY series was to be aligned with the new narrative reason of ‘Adjustment Disorder’ which is best suited for the medical assessment made by the Navy Medical Center in Portsmouth in late 2006.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 091

    Original file (2012 091.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the year of 2011, the applicant had two documented alcohol incidents and received NJP for the aforementioned UCMJ Articles 92, 107 and 128. As of ALCOAST 125/10, the SPD code of JND is prescribed for individuals with two accumulated alcohol incidents. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 036

    Original file (2013 036.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    sale — ell DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-036 TIS 1 yrs, 9 months, 15 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure due to refusing further treatment for substance abuse. The command sent the applicant for a substance abuse screening at the nearby US Naval Hospital. A separate administrative remarks entry indicates that the applicant refused treatment on that same day in the summer of 2010.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 064

    Original file (2013 064.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant is asking that the board look at the entirety of service time with regard to the Character of Service that was issued. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Propriety: Discharge was proper.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 063

    Original file (2013 063.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant was given an Honorable Discharge and the most favorable Narrative Reason for separation. Administrative change will be made to the correct Separation Authority to COMDTINST M1000.4, Art.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 033

    Original file (2014 033.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2014-033 NAME E3 CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, CGPSC-EPM, JKQ, Misconduct, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED | Honorable RELIEF GRANTED Honorable, JND SPD code, Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons BY DRB ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS 2 yrs, 3 months, 6 days Policy Implications __| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Commission of a Serious Offense in 2013. The command recommended the applicant for an...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 015

    Original file (2013 015.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-015 TIS 5 yrs, 3 months, 9 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to making False Official Statements, substandard performance, and an attempt to compromise an End of Course Test. Removal of the scratch paper would have resulted in a test compromise. Applicant was reduced to Pay Grade E-2 as a result of this NJP.